Authors:LAG
Created:2012-03-18
Last updated:2023-09-18
Legal aid after the Lords
.
.
.
Administrator
Over the last two weeks, the legal aid bill has been through report stage in the House of Lords. With only third reading to go, where are we now? See our posts from last summer setting out the detail as originally proposed. There have been some government concessions in the months since, with more during the course of report stage:
Bringing immigration domestic violence cases back into scope
Bringing illegal eviction claims back into scope and expanding the range of counterclaims allowed in possession proceedings
Extending legal aid for special educational needs cases to clients aged up to 25
Removing the power to means test for police station advice
Amending the definition of domestic violence as a pre-requisite for private law family legal aid
Allowing legal aid for clinical negligence at or shortly after birth
Giving the Lord Chancellor power to extend the scope of the legal aid scheme by order
Making legal aid available for domestic as well as international child abduction
Allowing employment claims by trafficking victims against those who have exploited them
Removing community care from the telephone gateway The government have also lost votes on the following issues:
Requiring the Lord Chancellor to secure access to justice
Making legal aid available to victims of domestic violence
Ensuring the independence of the Director of Legal Aid Casework (the replacement for the LSC)
Retaining legal aid for welfare benefits reviews, appeals and onward appeals
Funding expert reports in clinical negligence cases
Requiring the Lord Chancellor to ensure the availability of face to face advice (removing the power to create a mandatory telephone gateway) So what happens now? The concessions are definite. The government already have, or have undertaken to, amended the bill. But the lost votes could still be overturned, as they have to be approved by the House of Commons. See the LAG blog for a discussion of whether "financial privilege" (the mechanism that allowed the government to overturn Lords amendments to the Welfare Reform Bill) could be used on legal aid - the final shape of the legal aid bill is still not settled.