metadata toggle
Litigators’ graduated fees
 
Litigators’ graduated fees1Remuneration Regulations 2013 Sch 2. Claims are normally made on form LF1
5.93Great efficiency is required as the fixed and graduated fees allow no room for unnecessary or repeated work.
Non-indictable jurisdiction
5.94This jurisdiction is normally dealt with by fixed fees to which there are no additions, though the exceptional provisions on confiscation below may apply (and hourly rates apply to ‘prescribed’ proceedings: see chapter 10). The fee includes any attendance upon an advocate at the Crown Court and such attendances, unless required by professional duties, are unlikely to be made. The fees are given in the table (see below) and are exclusive of VAT.2Sch 2 para 19. These fees relate to cases beginning on or after 1 April 2016.
5.95
Attendance type
Fee
Appeal against sentence
£155.32
Appeal against conviction
£349.47
Committal for sentence
£232.98
Contempt proceedings – involving a non-defendant (for defendants the work is covered by the normal fee). These proceedings should be distinguished from contempt in civil proceedings which are prescribed proceedings (see chapter 11)
£116.49
Breach of Crown Court order
£77.66
Hearing subsequent to sentence:
Crime and Disorder Act 1998 s1CA (variation and discharge of orders under s1C)
£155.32
£155.32
Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 s155 (alteration of Crown Court sentence)
£155.32
Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 s74 (assistance by defendant; review of sentence)
£155.32
Figure 5.1 Summary of calculation of litigator’s fee
~
h-9022
5.96There are no mark-ups for acting for additional defendants3R v Sturmer and Lewis [2009] 2 Costs LR 364, SCCO 277/08. but a separate fixed fee is paid for each appeal or committal.
5.97The fact that cases are sentenced together is not relevant if they commenced as two cases. If the cases are committed on separate dates but listed together separate fixed fees remain payable as there were two sets of proceedings.4R v Griffiths SCCO 277/10.
5.98Even if cases are committed on the same day for sentence there are separate proceedings and so separate cases when they were charged separately and there were:
(a)two prosecution files;
(b)two applications for a representation order;
(c)two magistrates’ court numbers;
(d)two S numbers in the Crown Court;
(e)two memoranda of conviction.5R v Schilling SCCO 22/11.
5.99Fixed fees for a committal for sentence or breach will be payable in addition to any litigator’s graduate fee for a case that is sent for trial at the same time.
5.100Solicitors will, prior to appeal or committal, need to consider with a client whether they can provide a professional service at such fees and advise clients appropriately where there are alternative ways to proceed. Thus, for example, if there are disputed facts on a guilty plea it will be necessary to consider with a client whether the fact that a trial fee is payable for a Newton hearing in the Crown Court may enable the case to be better prepared.
5.101The fees for breach in this table are limited to breach of a Crown Court sentencing order.6CCFG Appendix I. Where the breach is itself a criminal offence, full graduated fees are available. Guidance is given in CCFG Appendix F. If a person commits two breaches of an order separately alleged, two fees will be payable.7CCFG 3.18.
5.102The fee for contempt proceedings is limited to contempt arising during the course of the criminal proceedings and not those that are identified as prescribed proceedings.
Representation in prescribed proceedings in the Crown Court
5.103These are described in chapter 10 and may arise on an application to vary or discharge an order8SCC B10.133–10.144. and the Remuneration Regulations 2013 provide that hourly rates apply as if the work was carried out in the magistrates’ court. Care should be taken not to exceed the fee limit of £1,368.75 without obtaining authority to do so on Form CRM5.
Indictable jurisdiction
Defence elections for trial in either way case which do not result in a trial or discontinuance of all charges
5.104The normal rules, for cases where the magistrates’ court declines jurisdiction, are set out below. Those rules also apply if a trial takes place following a defence election, or if following such an election the Crown offers no evidence in relation to all matters.
5.105However, a very rigid fixed fee scheme applies if, the particular defendant elects for trial, and there is no trial either because there is an acceptable plea by the defence to one or more matters. The fixed fee applies even if the Crown substitutes a different charge to which the defendant would have pleaded guilty in the magistrates’ court.
5.106The fixed fee is £330.33 per set of proceedings for all cases where the representation order is dated on or after 1 April 2016.9Sch 2 para 11.
5.107The fixed fee for advocacy is paid in addition.
5.108If there are confiscation proceedings the normal rules (at para 5.143) apply in addition to the fixed fee.
Other cases on indictment
5.109The following rules apply in
indictable only cases;
in either way cases where the magistrates’ court declines jurisdiction (Form LAC1 should be obtained at the magistrates’ court to prove that this was the position);
in either way cases categorised as a trial notwithstanding a defence election;
in an either way defence election case when the Crown offers no evidence on all charges.
5.110To calculate the appropriate fee, six pieces of information are required. Subject to very limited exceptions (see para 5.140) there are no additional payments and no payment is made for attendance upon an advocate. When the case is sent to the Crown Court under Crime and Disorder Act 1998 s51 there is no fee for the magistrates’ court other than as part of the litigator’s fee.
5.1111) The offence classification
See para 5.3 and appendix G.
5.1122) The number of PPE
If a case, which is not a very high cost case (VHCC), has more than 10,000 pages, it is treated as having 10,000 pages. The 10,000 page cut-off is lawful (see para 5.143 below).
5.113Special preparation may then be claimed for the number of pages by which the PPE exceeds 10,000. The fee is calculated on the number of hours it reasonably takes to read the excess, by a fee earner of the grade actually and reasonably used.
5.114Special preparation can also be claimed where a case is heard on indictment and any of the relevant prosecution material is served in electronic form only, does not count towards PPE, and it is reasonable to make an additional payment based on the number of hours considered reasonable to view the material at the hourly rates appearing below. Electronic evidence is any document provided on CD-Rom or by other means of electronic communication. It does not include audio or video cassettes. To claim the time reasonably spent considering a CD-Rom, it must contain evidence (and not unused material) which falls within the definition of Remuneration Regulations 2013 Sch 2 para 1(2), as amended (see para 5.20).
5.115If the electronic evidence includes prosecution evidence or exhibits it is often financially advantageous to claim the PPE mark-up described at para 5.20 when this is possible.
5.116More information on special preparation appears at para 5.143.
5.1173) Whether the case is a trial, cracked or guilty plea
A case is a trial if the rules at para 5.51 apply or there is a Newton hearing. A case is a cracked trial if it is not resolved by a guilty plea or an acquittal at the first hearing at which a plea is entered. A case is a guilty plea if it is resolved by an acquittal or conviction at or before the first hearing at which a plea is entered.
5.118Special rules apply when there has been a section 51 sending and the case is discontinued before any evidence is served or an application is made to dismiss (see para 5.136).
5.1194) The length of a trial (see para 5.77)
If a case which is not a VHCC lasts more than 200 days, it is treated as if it lasted 200 days.10Sch 2 para 2(6).
5.1205) The number of defendants represented
The multipliers applicable also appear at appendix H and are set out below:
Total number represented
Percentage uplift
2–4
20%
5 +
30%
5.1216) The proportion of the case on which the litigator represented the defendant and when there is more than one trial
If a firm does not represent a defendant throughout a case, or the case goes to retrial (as to which see para 5.61 above), only a percentage of the calculated fee will apply in accordance with the complex provisions of Remuneration Regulations 2013 Sch 2 para 13. The details appear at appendix H and are set out below.
5.122In cases which have been sent for trial at the election of the defendant, the initial fee payable on a transfer is £330.33 (from 1 April 2016). However, if a trial does in fact result the original litigator is entitled to claim the balance of the fee due under the table that follows, but giving credit for the amount already received.
Scenario
Percentage of the total fee
Case type used to determine total fee
Timing of claim
Cracked trial before retrial where there is no change of litigator
25%
Cracked trial
Retrial, where there is no change of litigator
25%
Trial
Transfer at or before the first hearing at which the assisted person enters a plea (original litigator)
25%
Cracked trial
Transfer at or before the first hearing at which the assisted person enters a plea– guilty plea (new litigator)
100%
Guilty plea
Transfer at or before the first hearing at which the assisted person enters a plea– cracked trial (new litigator)
100%
Cracked trial
Transfer at or before the first hearing at which the assisted person enters a plea– trial (new litigator)
100%
Trial
Before trial transfer (original litigator)
75%
Cracked trial
Before trial transfer – cracked trial (new litigator)
100%
Cracked trial
Before trial transfer – trial (new litigator)
100%
Trial
During trial transfer (original litigator)
100%
Trial
Claim up to and including the day before the transfer
During trial transfer (new litigator)
50%
Trial
Claim for the full trial length
Transfer after trial or guilty plea and before sentencing hearing (original litigator)
100%
Trial, cracked trial or guilty plea as appropriate
Claim for the full trial length excluding the length of the sentencing hearing
Transfer after trial or guilty plea and before sentencing hearing (new litigator)
10%
Trial
Claim for one day or for the length of the sentencing hearing if longer than one day
Transfer before retrial (original litigator)
25%
Cracked trial
Transfer before cracked retrial (new litigator)
50%
Cracked trial
Transfer before retrial (new litigator)
50%
Trial
Claim for the full retrial length
Transfer during retrial (original litigator)
25%
Trial
Claim up to and including the day before the transfer
Transfer during retrial (new litigator)
50%
Trial
Claim for the full retrial length
Transfer after retrial or cracked retrial and before sentencing hearing (original litigator)
25%
Trial or cracked trial as appropriate
Claim for the full retrial length, excluding the length of the sentencing hearing
Transfer after retrial or cracked retrial and before sentencing hearing (new litigator)
10%
Trial
Claim for one day or for the length of the sentencing hearing if longer than one day
The proportions shown are of the total fee so that a page count is included.
5.123A litigator may not be treated as both the original and a new litigator in the same case. A transfer occurs if the defendant had previously represented himself or been privately represented by the same firm. A case is not treated as transferred where:
(a)a firm of solicitors is named as litigator in the representation order and the solicitor or other appropriately qualified person with responsibility for the case moves to another firm;
(b)a firm of solicitors is named as litigator in the representation order and the firm changes (whether by merger or acquisition or in some other way), but so that the new firm remains closely related to the firm named in the order; or
(c)a solicitor or other appropriately qualified person is named as litigator in the representation order, and responsibility for the case is transferred to another solicitor or appropriately qualified person in the same firm or a closely related firm.
5.124Where a case is transferred to a new litigator and then transferred again, that litigator is treated as follows:
Scenario
Litigator treatment
Transfer before trial or retrial
Original litigator
Transfer during trial or retrial
New litigator
Transfer after trial or retrial but before the sentencing hearing
No payment to be made
5.125Because of the need for certainty in a graduated fee scheme, there must be defined point of time, which can be objectively ascertained, at which a transfer takes place. This is the signing of an amendment to the representation order being seen and accepted by the solicitor whose acceptance is subject to carrying out proper conflict checks. As a result courts should, before amending an order, ensure that the solicitor has seen a full list of witnesses and a case summary.11Tuckers v LC [2013] EWHC 3827(QB).
5.126Where a representation order is withdrawn this is treated as a transfer away from the litigator at the date of withdrawal.
Retrial fees
5.127Remuneration Regulations 2013 Sch 2 para 13 identifies how fees for re-trials are calculated and this emphasises the need to identify whether the particular case is a trial and retrial, or a longer trial. Page count does not increase if there is a retrial.
13(1)Where following a trial an order is made for a retrial and the same litigator acts for the assisted person at both trials the fee payable to that litigator is–
(a)in respect of the first trial, a fee calculated in accordance with the provisions of this Schedule; and
(b)in respect of the retrial, 25% of the fee, as appropriate to the circumstances of the retrial, in accordance with the provisions of this Schedule.
VHCC cases
5.128Special rules apply in VHCC cases. When a case is transferred to a new litigator12Remuneration Regulations 2013 Sch 2 para 13(8). because it is a VHCC, the outgoing solicitor is paid by the Complex Crime Unit (CCU) at VHCC rates for the work actually and reasonably done by them. The payment is under the individual VHCC contracts unless the representation order is withdrawn when the table above applies.13Remuneration Regulations 2013 Sch 2 para 13(9).
Calculation
5.129The calculation is best done on the LAA litigator fee calculator available at www.justice.gov.uk. However, as with all computer systems, care is needed in their operation.
5.130In managing a case solicitors will wish to calculate in advance the likely fee. The following stages apply.
Stage 1
5.131Identify whether the number of PPE exceeds the relevant cut-off identified for cracked trials, guilty pleas and trial.
Stage 2
5.132If the number does not exceed the cut-off, the payments below are due.
Number of pages not exceeding cut-off for cracked trials and guilty pleas
(a)A basic fee.
(b)A defendant uplift on the basic fee for the number represented by the firm.
(c)An adjustment of the basic fee if the firm did not act throughout the case.
Number of pages not exceeding cut-off for trials
(a)A basic fee.
(b)A length of trial uplift/depending on the number of days of trial.
(c)A defendant uplift on (a) and (b) for the number represented by the firm.
(d)An adjustment of the total of (a) and (b) if the firm did not act throughout the case.
Stage 3
5.133If the number of PPE exceeds the ‘cut off’, the payments below are due.
Number of pages exceeding cut-off for cracked trials and guilty pleas
A ‘final’ fee as defined below.
A final fee (F) is represented by:
I + (D × i)
where:
Iis the initial fee as appropriate for the class of case;
Dis the number of pages minus the lower figure and of the rele-vant PPE range; and
iis the incremental fee per page set out;
and a defendant uplift on the final fee for the number represented by the firm (and an adjustment on the final fee if the firm did not act throughout the case).
Number of pages exceeding cut-off for trials
A ‘final’ fee as defined below.
A final fee (F) is represented by:
I + (D × i)
where:
Iis the initial fee as appropriate for the class of case;
Dis the number of pages of relevant prosecution material minus the lower figure of the relevant PPE range; and
iis the incremental fee per page;
and a defendant uplift on the final fee for the number represented by the firm (and an adjustment to the final fee if the firm did not act throughout the case).
5.134The uplifts for the number of defendants represented by a firm are set out in appendix H.
5.135The adjustment for firms that do not act throughout apply when this is a transfer of legal aid or a representation order is withdrawn or a VHCC is agreed, or there is a retrial. These appear above and at appendix H.
Discontinuances and dismissals
5.136Special rules apply where the proceedings have been sent or transferred.14Crime and Disorder Act 1998 s51; Remuneration Regulations 2013 Sch 2 para 21.
5.137When those proceedings are discontinued or dismissed fees are payable as follows:
Scenario
Fee
If proceedings discontinued prior to service of the evidence
50% of the appropriate basic guilty plea fee
If proceedings discontinued or dismissed on a defence application (with any surviving allegations remitted to the magistrates’ court)
The full fee appropriate for a guilty plea
5.138Defendant uplifts apply to these figures.15Remuneration Regulation 2013 Sch 2 para 22.
5.139An application to dismiss which does not succeed adds no value to the litigator’s fee.
Escape provisions: additional payments; special preparation
5.140These are very limited. The graduated fees include any attendance upon an advocate at court and such attendances, unless required by professional duties, are unlikely to be provided.
5.141No additional fee is normally payable for any work done in connection with a sentencing or deferred sentencing hearing.
Unused material in long cases
5.142Significant risks of injustice arise in cases with significant amounts of unused material as no additional provision is made for the situ-ation. A firm’s only remedy, in a case that may exceed 25 days at trial, is to seek a VHCC contract if the firm is on the VHCC panel or can reach a suitable agency agreement with such a firm.
Special preparation (Sch 2 para 20), ie electronic evidence and PPE in excess of 10,000 and confiscation proceedings (Sch 2 para 26)16Use Form LF1 special preparation to validate the claim.
5.143Hourly rates are available for the consideration of the pages of PPE in excess of 10,000, and where any of the prosecution material is served in electronic form only and does not qualify as PPE. The 10,000 page limit is lawful.17R v Jagelo 2015 SCCO 96/15.
5.144This also applies to work in connection with confiscation proceedings and this should be separately recorded. For this reason a confiscation file should be opened at the first opportunity as the fees are additional to the graduated fees.
5.145If the work is actually and reasonably undertaken, an extra payment will also be paid by the appropriate hourly rate for the work in connection with such material. This will only apply to material that would qualify as PPE if that material were in paper form.18Lord Chancellor v Michael J Reed Ltd [2009] EWHC 2981 (QB). Electronic discs of an audio record, even though served as evidence or an exhibit, cannot count towards page count or (for that reason) as special preparation, save to the extent that they are reduced by the Crown to a transcript.19Lord Chancellor v McLarty & Co Solicitors [2011] EWHC 3182 (QB).
5.146The work is remunerated depending on the grade of fee earner engaged in the following areas:20Sch 2 para 27.
(a)for preparation, including taking instructions, interviewing witnesses, ascertaining the prosecution case, preparing and perusing documents, dealing with letters and telephone calls, instructing an advocate and expert witnesses, conferences, consultations and work done in connection with advice on appeal;
(b)for attending at court where an advocate is instructed including conferences with the advocate at court; attendances are often made in such cases;
(c)for travelling and waiting; and
(d)for writing routine letters and dealing with routine telephone calls.
Chapter 1 sets out the relevant considerations.
5.147Fee earners are at three grades. These are defined by regulation 2 of the Remuneration Regulations 2013.
5.148Senior solicitor (Grade A) means a solicitor who in the judgment of the appropriate officer has the skill knowledge and experience to deal with the most difficult and complex cases.
5.149Solicitor, legal executive or fee earner of equivalent experience (Grade B) means a solicitor, Fellow of the Institute of Legal Execu-tives or equivalent senior fee earner who in the judgment of the appropriate officer has good knowledge and experience of the conduct of criminal cases.
5.150Trainee solicitor or fee earner of equivalent experience ( Grade C) means a trainee solicitor or other fee earner who is not a Fellow of the Institute of Legal Executives who in the judgment of the appropriate officer carries out routine work on a case.
5.151Grade A is a senior solicitor and so must be qualified. Grade B is a solicitor, legal executive or fee earner of equivalent experience. Grade C is for trainees and those of equivalent experience. It must be reasonable to use the fee earner of the relevant grade.
5.152In making that decision not only is the complexity of the case relevant,21R v Green TMC S13. but the nature of the defendant.22R v Bury Magistrates’ Court ex p Cornthwaite CO 296/95. TONG suggests that Grade A fee earners will deal with cases in classes 1 and 223As defined, in the original guidance by the Consolidated Criminal Practice Direction: Classification of Crown Court Business and Allocation to Crown Court Centres. This appears now to accord with Classes 1 and 2 of the Criminal Practice Directions X111 B1 Classification. and the unusually serious or complex cases in other classes but subject in both cases to appropriate delegation. Complexity is of particular relevance in confiscation proceedings.24See also Halcrow TMC S14. There is a rule of thumb that about seven years’ experience of criminal work is required but with specialist firms the experience can be gained more quickly.25Badham SCTO 621/93. An unqualified but experienced member of staff may qualify as a Grade B fee earner and attention can be given to the person’s total experience of criminal law.26Ali TMC S12. The definitions in the Regulations suggest that if the work conducted is more than routine Grade B at least should be claimed. Those attending court in confiscation proceedings will often need to read themselves in to a case if they are not the fee earner handling the matter.
Enhanced fees in confiscation cases (Sch 2 para 2)
5.153For work in connection with confiscation proceedings only, enhancement remains available on the terms that follow. A fee earner of a lower grade undertaking work beyond the skills normally -expected at that level may justify enhancement (principles are set out in chapter 1):
1)Enhancement is available for preparation, attendance at court where more than one representative is instructed, routine letters written and routine telephone calls in respect of offences in -Classes A, B, C, D, G, I, J or K in the table of offences.
2)Enhanced fees are payable if taking into account all the relevant circumstances of the case:
(a)the work was done with exceptional competence, skill or expertise;
(b)the work was done with exceptional despatch; or
(c)the case involved exceptional complexity or other exceptional circumstances.
Exceptional means unusual or out of the ordinary compared with the generality of criminal proceedings.
3)Enhancement is paid by a percentage uplift dependent on:
(a)the degree of responsibility accepted by the fee earner;
(b)the care, speed and economy with which the case was prepared; and
(c)the novelty, weight and complexity of the case;
but because of the decision in Backhouse will not be less than 100 per cent which is also the maximum;27R v Backhouse TMC S3. see chapter 1 above on enhancement generally).
Enhancement is not available for the special preparation in considering pages over 10,000 or electronic material.28Lord Chancellor v McLarty & Co. Solicitors [2011] EWHC 3182 (QB); R v Brandon [2012] 2 Costs LR 424.
Hourly rates29Remuneration Regulations 2013 Sch 2 para 27.
5.154These rates are exclusive of VAT and apply to cases with a representation order dated on or after 1 April 2016.
Class of work
Grade of fee earner
Rate
Variations
Preparation
Senior solicitor
£48.36 per hour
£50.87 per hour for a litigator whose office is situated within the City of London or a London borough
Solicitor, legal executive or fee earner of equivalent experience
£41,06 per hour
£43.12 per hour for a litigator whose office is situated within the City of London or a London borough
Trainee or fee earner of equivalent experience
£27.15 per hour
£31.03 per hour for a litigator whose office is situated within the City of London or a London borough
Attendance at court where more than one representative instructed
Senior solicitor
£38.55 per hour
Solicitor, legal executive or fee earner of equivalent experience
£31.03 per hour
Trainee or fee earner of equivalent experience
£18.71 per hour
Travelling and waiting
Senior solicitor
£22.58 per hour
Solicitor, legal executive or fee earner of equivalent experience
£22.58 per hour
Trainee or fee earner of equivalent experience
£11.41 per hour
Writing routine letters and dealing with routine telephone calls
£3.15 per item
£3.29 per item for a litigator whose office is situated within the City of London or a London borough
Special circumstances
Warrant cases (Sch 2 para 23)30See CCFG 3.3.23.
5.155Where a defendant fails to appear and a warrant is issued and not executed for three months, special rules apply.
Indictable cases
1)If the warrant is issued at or before the first hearing at which a plea is entered, a guilty plea fee is payable.
2)If the warrant is issued after the first hearing at which a plea is entered but before trial, a cracked trial fee is payable.
3)If the warrant is issued during trial and the trial aborts, a trial fee is payable as if the trial ended on that day.
Fixed fee cases
The appropriate fee is paid.
If the warrant is then executed within 15 months and the matter proceeds, credit has to be given for the amount already paid. After 15 months a further full fee would be paid.
Retrials
5.156If there is a retrial, as now defined (see para 5.61), two bills are delivered; one for the original and one for the retrial. The second bill abates in accordance with the table in appendix H.
Evidence provision fee31See CCFG Appendix L.
5.157As part of the implementation of Crown Court means testing an evidence provision fee was introduced where solicitors assist a client to provide documents in support of an application. This fee is only payable if the case is on indictment and evidence is required and provided above what is needed for the magistrates’ court.
5.158The fee is set at two levels:
£45
Where 1–4 items of such a kind are provided.
£90
Where 5 or more items of such a kind are provided; or where a case involves a self employed applicant and is referred to the National Courts Team.
Disbursements( reg 17)
5.159Disbursements including travel expenses connected to preparation or court attendance are payable in addition to the litigator’s graduated fee. Vouchers for disbursements over £20 should be sent to the LAA; vouchers for those over £10 should be kept on file. Disbursements are considered in more detail in chapter 8.
 
1     Remuneration Regulations 2013 Sch 2. Claims are normally made on form LF1 »
2     Sch 2 para 19. »
3     R v Sturmer and Lewis [2009] 2 Costs LR 364, SCCO 277/08. »
4     R v Griffiths SCCO 277/10. »
5     R v Schilling SCCO 22/11. »
6     CCFG Appendix I. »
7     CCFG 3.18. »
8     SCC B10.133–10.144. »
9     Sch 2 para 11. »
10     Sch 2 para 2(6). »
11     Tuckers v LC [2013] EWHC 3827(QB). »
12     Remuneration Regulations 2013 Sch 2 para 13(8). »
13     Remuneration Regulations 2013 Sch 2 para 13(9). »
14     Crime and Disorder Act 1998 s51; Remuneration Regulations 2013 Sch 2 para 21. »
15     Remuneration Regulation 2013 Sch 2 para 22. »
16     Use Form LF1 special preparation to validate the claim. »
17     R v Jagelo 2015 SCCO 96/15. »
18     Lord Chancellor v Michael J Reed Ltd [2009] EWHC 2981 (QB). »
19     Lord Chancellor v McLarty & Co Solicitors [2011] EWHC 3182 (QB). »
20     Sch 2 para 27. »
21     R v Green TMC S13. »
22     R v Bury Magistrates’ Court ex p Cornthwaite CO 296/95. »
23     As defined, in the original guidance by the Consolidated Criminal Practice Direction: Classification of Crown Court Business and Allocation to Crown Court Centres. This appears now to accord with Classes 1 and 2 of the Criminal Practice Directions X111 B1 Classification. »
24     See also Halcrow TMC S14. »
25     Badham SCTO 621/93. »
26     Ali TMC S12. »
27     R v Backhouse TMC S3. »
28     Lord Chancellor v McLarty & Co. Solicitors [2011] EWHC 3182 (QB); R v Brandon [2012] 2 Costs LR 424. »
29     Remuneration Regulations 2013 Sch 2 para 27. »
30     See CCFG 3.3.23. »
31     See CCFG Appendix L. »
Litigators’ graduated fees
Previous Next