metadata toggle
R v Merton, Sutton and Wandsworth Health Authority ex p Perry, Andrew and Harman
(2000) 3 CCLR 378
 
16.28R v Merton, Sutton and Wandsworth Health Authority ex p Perry, Andrew and Harman (2000) 3 CCLR 378
A closure decision was unlawful where the health authority disregarded a ‘home for life’ promise and failed, contrary to guidance, to undertake prior assessments
Facts: the health authority decided to close Orchard Hill, a long-stay hospital for people with profound learning disabilities, on economic grounds, despite having promised residents a ‘home for life’.
Judgment: Jackson J held that the health authority’s decision-making process was unlawful for two reasons: (1) it failed to take into account its promises of a ‘home for life’ (notwithstanding the failure of consultees to raise this matter), (2) inconsistently with the non-statutory guidance, on page 2 of HSG (92)42, it had failed to undertake individual assessments of the residents as to their future care needs.
R v Merton, Sutton and Wandsworth Health Authority ex p Perry, Andrew and Harman
Previous Next